Western Influences Upon Early Christianity

                             by Petros Presbeftes

                 Copyright 1989, All rights reserved.

 

     Early in the 4th Century, when the seeds of Papal  Authority  in  Rome

were  beginning to be sown, we started to see the growth of what eventually

became  to  be  known  as  Western  Scholastic  Thought   centered   around

individualistic  Monarchical  attitudes  concerning  the interpretations of

Church Government and the Word of God.  In the area of  Church  Government,

we  saw radical motions toward New Dogmatic Declarations without benefit of

a Church wide Council.  These dogmatic declarations along  with  increasing

claims of Papal Authority caused great alarm in the Early Christian Church,

and led eventually to the East/West  Schism  of  1054,  whereby  the  Roman

Bishop  in  the  West was excommunicated from the Church.  The Roman Church

has continued in a state of Schismatic behaviour towards the  Church  until

the  early  20th  Century,  when  talks between the Pope and the Ecumenical

Patriarch of Constantinople began making progress towards a change in Roman

attitude  concerning  Papal Authority, and the adoption of the Nicene Creed

in its original form.  But the work is still not yet over,  and  the  Roman

Church  today is still considered Schismatic because the Roman Church still

holds to unsupported Dogmas not considered by the  Whole  Body  of  Christ.

Therefore,  until  this  situation  is  healed,  we  have  to  postpone our

enthusiasm over the possible return of the Roman  Catholic  Body  to  God's

Holy  Orthodox Church.  We must say that never before have we been SO CLOSE

to accomplishing this miracle between East and West.

 

     This paper deals with today's current situation in most Denominational

Churches  today:   That of Monarchical Tendencies concerning decisions that

affect the Church in toto.

 

     As a demonstration of the problem posed above, we have  the  following

fictional example:

 

          Some brethren get together in a prayer meeting,  and

          then  make declarations about interpretations of the

          Bible, and seemingly are in contact  with  God,  the

          Holy   Spirit.   Anything  they  would  say  in  the

          'Spirit' would be  viewed  as  infallible  with  the

          feature  of  perfect communion in the 'Spirit' being

          placed forward as the argument for why  this  is  an

          'infallible' revelation.

 

   BUT ONLY JESUS CHRIST IS PERFECT IN ALL THINGS,  AND  ONLY  JESUS

   CHRIST HAD A PERFECT UNION OF DIVINE AND HUMAN; THE HUMAN PART OF

   HIM BEING BOTH IN THE IMAGE AND LIKENESS OF GOD.  JESUS MADE  HIS

   HUMAN  NATURE  PERFECTLY  HUMBLE WITH RESPECT TO GOD THE FATHER'S

   WILL.  NO MAN COULD DO WHAT JESUS DID, BECAUSE IT TAKES THE POWER

   THAT GOD HAS TO TRANSFORM MAN'S FLESH BACK INTO THE INSTRUMENT OF

   GOD'S WILL.  MAN'S  NATURE  HAS  NOT  BEEN  RESTORED  INTO  TOTAL

   LIKENESS WITH GOD, SINCE MAN HAD LOST THIS LIKENESS AT THE GARDEN

   OF EDEN BECAUSE OF ADAM AND EVE'S ORIGINAL SIN.  BECAUSE  OF  THE

   HEALING  POWER OF JESUS CHRIST, WE ARE GRANTED THE OPPORTUNITY TO

   GROW TOWARDS THE GOAL OF PERFECT LIKENESS WITH GOD (THEOSIS), BUT

   IT  IS NOT OURS TO ATTAIN FULLY HERE ON EARTH, BUT IN HEAVEN WHEN

   WE MEET OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST IN THE AIR.

 

     Therefore, we might question  whether  or  not  the  brethren  in  our

fictitious  example have the authority to do what has been by Tradition the

actions of the whole body of Christ in toto?  How can an EAR do the HEARING

AND  the  SEEING  AND  the SPEAKING AND the other things that are naturally

done by each of the other members of the Body according to their  function.

It  would  seem  that some could easily arrive at the conclusion that these

brethren above cited are taking on BODY OF CHRIST-WIDE  FUNCTIONS  RESERVED

FOR THE ENTIRE BODY AND/OR FOR JESUS CHRIST.

 

     YET THIS SITUATION IS NOT NEW  TO  THE  ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCH  WHICH

THROUGH  THE OFFICE OF THE POPE ASSERTED THE SAME TYPE OF BEHAVIOUR AS THAT

OF OUR EXAMPLE ABOVE.  The only difference here is that each of the  Pope's

decisions  AFFECTED THE ENTIRE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH whether the individual

members consented or not.

 

     After the East/West Schism of 1054, matters in Rome became  worse  and

still  worse.   It  was quite evident that as Divine Rule ended in favor of

Worldly Rule,  all  Holiness  left  and  Evil  instead  took  over.   Gross

injustices,  Greed,  Lust  for  Power,  Hatred, worldly councils of judges;

pawns to the Holy Roman Empire, and other sundry evils infested  the  Roman

Catholic  Church.  These were the dark ages in the West, and Roman Theology

began taking on Pagan Influences and Philosophies,  transforming  the  Holy

Trinity  into  a  very  impersonal  'God' with pagan attributes 'Who' would

squash all who would dare attack the Roman Catholic Church.  It is  amazing

how  fast we saw the EGO TRIPS of the individual Popes one after the other.

Not all Popes were this morally corrupt, nor is  a  judgment  being  passed

here,  but the visible elements of many of these were apparently Evil.  All

of this led to a climax point in Western Church History:   the  Reformation

and the Counter-Reformation.

 

     Let us examine some of the points and reasons behind  the  Reformation

for a moment:

 

1. The Leaders of the Reformation Movement were looking  for  moral  reform

inside  the  only  Church  they  knew:   the  Roman  Catholic Church.  They

correctly perceived that The Roman Catholic Church of that day was  morally

corrupt  and  dead  in  the  Divine  Powers from above.  The Roman Catholic

Church had become corrupt in her administrations of God's Holy Sacraments -

a  thing  which  Jesus  promised  could never and would never happen to His

One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

 

2. The Leaders  of  the  Reformation  were  looking  for  relief  from  the

oppresive Monarchy of the Pope.

 

3. The Leaders of the Reformation were seeking relief from  the  injustices

and evils from within the boundaries of the Roman Catholic Church.

 

     Therefore the Leaders of the Reformation sought to  protest  from  the

Church  authorities  and  break  away from the Roman Catholic Church and to

worship Jesus Christ by  the  infallibility  of  God's  Word  in  the  Holy

Scripture,  and  to  throw  out all of the traditions of the Roman Catholic

Church as heresy, whether meritorious or not.  The reactions  displayed  by

this protest were highly emotional and had the classical characteristics of

a reflex prone response.

 

     The characteristics of the Protest were to 'go  back  to  the  drawing

board', 'make new dogmatic declarations by re-interpreting Holy Scripture',

'following in many cases the dogmatic declarations propounded  by  each  of

the   leaders',   'while   at  the  same  time  encouraging  individualized

interpretations of Holy Scripture by each given member in total or  partial

isolation  from  the  other  among  the  constituents  of  this new body of

believers'.  The dogmatic declarations of each  individual  leader  of  the

Reformation  gave  way  to  divisions  among  the  protesters,  because the

decisions upon which dogmas to keep or reject or create were each  in  turn

made in isolation from the rest of the body.  In many cases, the offices of

Apostles, Apostolic Succession, and the  Holy  Sacraments  were  redefined,

and/or abolished all together.

 

     One is tempted to ask:  What was accomplished by the Reformation  when

one  set  of  problems  were  traded off for another set?  Indeed the issue

which was the most important was the one of Papal Authoritarianism.  Giving

rise to the Protestant movement, we see Authoritarianism among its members;

where each member has his or her point  of  view  about  Church  dogma.   A

trade-off  to  Calvinistic Authoritarianism, which then seems to have grown

into individualistic Authoritarianism over the body of Protestant believers

seems  to  be at the root cause of divisions in thought between the various

Denominations.

 

     But the key thing here is that there was as today  VAST  DISAGREEMENT,

VAST  DIVISION  IN THE BODY OF PROTESTERS OR PROTESTANTS AS THEY CAME LATER

TO BE LABELED BY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH.   ALL  THIS  GREW  OUT  OF  THE

ORIGINAL  SEED  OF  PAPAL  AUTHORITARIANISM,  AND  THIS LED DIRECTLY TO THE

SCHISM OF 1054.

 

     AS THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH WAS THE FIRST PROTESTER FROM THE  COLLEGE

OF  BISHOPS,  PREBYTERS,  DEACONS,  AND LAITY, IT SOWED THE SEEDS OF FUTURE

DIVISION AND ALIENATION FROM THE ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC, AND APOSTOLIC  CHURCH

WHICH STILL EXISTS TODAY.

 

     Taking a quick look, one  can  see  the  divisions  today:   over  100

denominations  among  those  who  call  themselves  'Christians'.   What  a

situation.  What a tradgedy!  In the  Holy  Orthodox  Church,  prayers  are

always  said for the unity of the Church.  What does this mean?  Do we mean

that a merger is envisioned whereby all the Denominations  come  under  one

government and authority to be known as the World Church?  Heaven forbid we

say NO!   Do  we  mean  that  UNIFICATION  represents  the  return  to  the

principles  of  the  Early  Church?  Yes, this is a part of what we mean by

UNITY.  But it goes much deeper than that even.  The Denominations  of  the

Protestant  and  Roman Catholic Churches, were inspired by men, and as such

in themselves lack the Divinity of God, their loss oftentimes made  up  for

by  the  faith  of its individual members instead of the 'church body' as a

unit.  These man-made manifestations of divisional Denominationalisms  need

to  be  abandoned in favor of the Early Church.  This means a return to the

Collegial Atmosphere of the Body of Christ acting as a unit to clarify  and

define  the  living  Divine Dogmas of the FAITH in Christ and God, the Holy

Trinity under the guidance and  protection  of  the  Holy  Spirit  of  God.

Instead  of  making a man or woman head of a church body, we need to return

Jesus Christ to the Head of His One, Holy, Catholic, and  Apostolic  Church

where  He has always belonged and where the Holy Orthodox Church has always

and will always place Him.

 

     How is the UNITY of the ONE Church maintained?   UNITY  is  maintained

through  God's  Holy  Sacraments  and through frequent Church-Wide Councils

where unanimity is cherished as a sign from the  Holy  Spirit  that  it  is

indeed  the  TRUTH from God, and not a partial TRUTH or complete FALSEHOOD.

The Body moves together in unity and through this displays the  full  power

of  Christ:  full of GLORY, and Mystical in its workings, FULL OF GRACE and

TRUTH.

 

     St. Iraeneus (1st Century AD) stated that the Church is a  Eucharistic

Community gathered round its Bishop.  This Bishop is charged to be our Icon

of Christ; bringing to us a living example of Christ as teacher and  Divine

inspirer of God's Divine Word, where Truth and Love flow without bound.

 

     May the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Love of  the  Father,  and

the  communion of the Good and Life-Giving Holy Spirit be with you, now and

for ever, and from all Ages to all Ages.  Amen.

 

Love in Christ,

Petros Presbeftes

Sysop,

Gospel Outreach Download System #2